The Skyhorse Post

The Fight Continues!
Democracy vs. The U.S. Army & Unchecked Military Contractors
in Southern Colorado

August 3rd, 2008

Senator Ken Salazar’s (D-Colo) appears to be playing both sides of the fence as pressure mounts for him to come forward take a clear unequivocal position on military land grabs of private and public lands for future use by the U.S. Army and military contractors in southern Colorado.

Not 1 More Acre is a grassroots organization that has works tirelessly with people on the ground who seek to hold the triad of U.S. Army, Defense Contractors, and Congressional representative accountable to the people they are sworn to serve.

RELEASE FROM NOT 1 MORE ACRE:

PETITION: Sign petition to document your position on this issue.

House Vote Establishes Piñon Canyon Funding Ban
Bipartisan Alliance Calls on Colorado Sen. Salazar to Lead Senate
From Not 1 More Acre!
For immediate release
August 1, 2008

TRINIDAD, Colorado (Friday, August 1): Opponents of Pentagon plans to expand the Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site in southeastern Colorado today marked an important victory with the US House of Representatives voting overwhelmingly to renew a ban on funding for all aspects of the expansion plan.

The strong bipartisan vote (409 votes to 4) means that the funding ban, first adopted last year, is part of the 2009 Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Bill. The ban - led by Colorado’s Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R, 4th CD) and Rep. John Salazar (D, 3rd CD) - prevents any expenditure on expanding facilities within the existing 238,000-acre PCMS or acquiring additional land. Board member of expansion opposition group Not 1 More Acre! Mack Louden said the House vote is clear evidence of the strong and determined popular opposition to expansion and indicates the will of our elected representatives to rein in the military on this issue.

“We recognize the efforts of our legislative heroes Rep. Musgrave and Rep. John Salazar in working to ensure there will be no expansion and no funding for expansion at Piñon Canyon,” Louden said. Louden called on Sen. Ken Salazar to ensure the Senate followed the House in acting to defend the communities and native grasslands of southeastern Colorado. Sen. Salazar has stated publicly that he supports a continuation of the ban and promised to introduce an amendment on the floor of the Senate to include the no-funding language in the Senate version of the same appropriation bill.

“Recent announcements by top Army officials that they will pursue expansion regardless of the Congressional funding ban demonstrate the Pentagon’s contempt for Congress and for democracy,” Louden said. “With the renewal of the funding ban the military must realize that this plan is finished.” “No matter how you look at it - as agricultural, economic, environmental, or even national security policy, the Pentagon’s plan makes little sense to anyone but the Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce and a few military contractors.”

“The environmental consequences for this fragile ecosystem and the rare wildlife it supports would be catastrophic. Ranchers whose relationships with the native grasslands go back many generations would lose their lands and their livelihoods. The region’s family ranching- and agriculture-based economy and the communities that depend upon it would be devastated. And a vast trove of historical, archaeological and paleontological treasures would be lost.” Kennie Gyurman, who lives next to the PCMS and whose family lost 5000 acres through condemnation by the military when the site was created in the early 1980s, said Colorado’s Congressional delegation must now work to end the expansion plan permanently.

“The people of southeastern Colorado have suffered for years as the Army has switched from one study to the next, one plan to the next and one map to the next,” Gyurman said. “This crippling uncertainty has to end. No one can invest in their land without worrying that it will be taken away just like in the 1980s.”

Not 1 More Acre! board member Jim Herrell urged Sen. Salazar to guard against last-minute attempts to move an amendment - introduced by the outgoing Sen. Wayne Allard in January 2007 (S 135) and now lurking in the committee stage - that would allow the Army to purchase land 60 days after the receipt of a report on the expansion plan.

The Army this month submitted a report on the expansion, as requested in separate legislation authored by Sen. Salazar and Sen. Allard late last year. “Today’s vote by the House establishes an unambiguous fiscal law preventing expansion at Piñon Canyon and is an important step towards releasing the region from years of irresponsible military policy seemingly determined by real estate deals,” Herrell said.

Not 1 More Acre!
Purgatoire, Apishapa & Comanche Grassland Trust
PO Box 773
Trinidad, CO 81082
www.not1moreacre.net/docs

Behind the Scenes
Presidential Campaign Sausage Making

July 17th, 2008




If when you see a candidate on television you assume that is how the person normally looks, take a look at this video. It will give you an idea of just how “constructed” every image has become. Now it seems, campaign staffers want to look through a reporter’s camera before they will agree to an interview. As if giving them time to put on their make-up before hand wasn’t enough.

Army & Defense Contractors
Mission: ‘Make Money’ First in Colorado’s Piñon Canyon

July 15th, 2008

The following is a summary was sent from a grassroots organization seeking to protect the environment and ranching culture in the American Southwest for all Americans. At issue is the U.S. Army’s attempt to grab some 400,000 acres of private and public lands for weapons testing and training.

Updates are available online at: The Piñon Canyon Expansion Opposition Coalition Website

# # #

Skyhorse Op/Ed

From reading the documents hosted at the Piñon Canyon Expansion Opposition Coalition website, it is difficult for many of us not to wonder how and why has this been allowed to happen?

“What happened to congressional and civilian oversight of the U.S. military and the military’s spending of our tax dollars?”

“What happened to due process for all citizens such as those who have lived, farmed or ranched in the Piñon Canyon region for generations?”

And finally…

“What happened to the basic principle of democracy, that says one person equals one vote”?

In this case and in many others you may know personally, what was once was yours’ is no longer. That’s right, it has been *SOLD* to someone else by someone else. That someone might not even be a real person, it may be a corporation that legally has all the rights of a person or it might be a politician who needs the money of large corporations in order to be re-elected.

Sadly, this is where we are today in the United States. Freedoms, protections, due process, and rights barely get a whiff of consideration when they come up against big money. The military once imbued with notions of duty, honor, and country is now mostly working for someone else, someplace else, other than U.S. citizens it is sworn to serve. The good news is that it is not too late! This terrible set of circumstance must and will be changed by ordinary people who care for democracy. Ordinary people of modest means and who care not only about democracy but for each other, our nation, and our world, our air, our water and yes of course our land too.

Please write us with your thoughts: kickit@theskyhorsepost.com
Subject Line:I AM A PERSON WHO CARES

# # #

Below is the update on Piñon Canyon provided by not1moreacre.com:

In the key November battleground state of Colorado, one of the most important national issues is a massive military land grab in the state’s southeast - a plan driven
not by any coherent national defense policy but by real estate deals.

To date, neither Colorado’s most influential Democrat, Senator Ken Salazar, nor the candidates to replace the outgoing Senator Wayne Allard (R) have denounced a pending bill that would allow military acquisition of property for expansion of the Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site (PCMS).

The Pentagon’s plan would take out 1000 square miles of the last intact shortgrass steppe in the American Great Plains - an area roughly 15 times the size of Washington DC. The proposal involves: tripling the size of the 238,000 acre PCMS; building out the existing site, including shopping centers and a medical clinic; and exponentially increasing the number of live-fire exercises, pyrotechnics and the use of incendiary and highly toxic weapons systems. Leaked documents show this is the first phase of a long-term plan that could swallow up to 5 million acres. The rarely used PCMS was created in the early 1980s, largely through the use of condemnation. At the time the land was taken the military promised no live fire and no expansion but has kept neither commitment.

The environmental consequences of the expansion on this fragile ecosystem and the rare wildlife it supports would be catastrophic. Ranchers whose relationship with the native grasslands goes back many generations would lose their lands and their livelihoods. The region’s family agriculture based economy and the communities that depend upon it would be devastated. And a vast trove of historical, archaeological and paleontological treasures would be lost.

At every level of democracy from the grassroots to the counties, from the Colorado State Assembly to the US Congress, diverse and bipartisan alliances have clearly voiced opposition to expansion at Piñon Canyon. Yet Sen. Salazar has worked alongside pro-expansion Republicans - the outgoing Sen, Allard and Rep. Doug Lamborn (CO 5th CD) - and the Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce to advance this disastrous proposal.

KEY POINTS
National defense policy is being set by real estate deals: In an extraordinary admission, the outgoing Sen. Allard told the Senate in January 2007 that Army officials had “repeatedly” assured him that the genesis of the expansion project “occurred when several landowners approached Fort Carson and expressed their strong desire to sell”. Sen. Allard made the remarks as he was introducing Senate Bill 135, an amendment designed to trigger a 60-day countdown to military acquisition of private property. That bill is still pending and there has to date been no opposition from Sen. Salazar.

Any real estate deal requires a willing seller and a willing buyer. Every level of democracy has clearly voiced its opposition to spending taxpayer dollars on the build-out and expansion of the PCMS. The Pentagon must answer to the people, not the other way around, and the people are not willing buyers of this land. American taxpayers already provide in excess of 25 million acres of US land for military use.

Unprecedented bipartisan opposition to the expansion: From the grassroots to the counties, from the Colorado State Assembly to the US Congress, bipartisan opposition to the expansion plan remains resolute. The 15 southern Colorado counties – who represent the communities that would be affected by the plan - led Colorado counties statewide in adopting a resolution opposed to expansion.
Last year Congress overwhelmingly approved a bill to block funding of all aspects of the build-out and expansion of the PCMS for 2008. The bill was authored by Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R, 4th CD) and cosponsored by Rep. John Salazar (D, 3rd CD) and received landslide support in the House (383-34). The funding prohibition passed the Senate despite tepid sponsorship.

Last month the House reaffirmed the no-funding language for 2009. On July 11, 2008, Sen. Salazar endorsed continuation of the no-funding law for 2009. However, he has not distanced himself from pro-expansion legislation he introduced with Sen. Allard.

Backroom deals: Despite sweeping opposition to expansion, Sen. Salazar has worked with the outgoing Sen, Allard, Rep. Lamborn and the Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce to advance the Pentagon’s plan. Sen. Salazar sits on the Senate Agriculture committee yet his pro expansion efforts are at complete odds with Colorado’s two House Agriculture Committee members, Rep. Musgrave and Rep. John Salazar, on this issue.

The Senators have repeatedly introduced legislation to facilitate expansion. In 2006 they introduced legislation asking for Army reports that would trigger a 30-day countdown to the military acquisition of property. That legislation effectively split the acreage expansion from the build-out of the existing site and helped to hide the full impact of the expansion project from public scrutiny. No review, approval or public disclosure of those reports was required by the legislation. Again, through 2007 legislation requiring more “studies” of expansion at the PCMS, Sen. Salazar and outgoing Sen. Allard have facilitated pro-expansion activities by for-profit military contractors such as Booz Allen Hamilton at great expense to taxpayers. Booz Allen Hamilton expenditures for the Senators’ studies are being investigated by the Government Accountability Office for violation of the no-funding law (the GAO report is due in November).

Sen. Allard currently has legislation waiting in committee (Senate Bill 135) that would use the submission of “studies” to trigger a 60-day countdown to the military acquisition of private property. That bill replicates legislation proposed jointly in the past by Sen. Salazar and Sen. Allard.

The three pro-expansion politicians and the Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce-with help from Booz Allen Hamilton - have lobbied hard to send more troops to Fort Carson and are using those extra numbers in their efforts to justify the expansion. Yet this is happening at a base that is experiencing severe urban encroachment and that has been investigated for its substandard treatment of soldiers suffering from brain injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder and for its unconscionable record of redeploying injured soldiers. Sen. Salazar has called for stationing brigades at Fort Carson above and beyond those approved to date. Militarizing the economies of southeastern Colorado while destroying the grasslands will not provide the support our troops desperately need.

Lack of public disclosure: On top of these legislative backroom deals, throughout this entire process the Army has avoided publicly disclosing the full impact of its plans for the region. In fact expansion opposition group Not 1 More Acre! is suing the Army in federal court, alleging that the Record of Decision for the Final Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site Transformation Environmental Impact Statement - issued on August 2, 2007 - violates the National Environmental Policy Act. (The complaint and the Army’s initial response filed last month can be accessed at www.not1moreacre.net/docs)

Part of the lawsuit alleges that while the Army has pushed to expand the site for years, the Transformation EIS disclosed only its plans to expand facilities and weapons ranges within the site’s existing boundaries (already twice the size of Colorado Springs). The massive expansion of acreage was illegally excluded from the public disclosure process. The people have been forced into court to find out what’s really happening.

What’s at stake: Grasslands are the most endangered ecoregion on earth and the interconnected grassland ecosystems of southeastern Colorado and northern New Mexico are of local and global significance. At stake is the key role the shortgrass steppe plays as precious and unique wildlife habitat, as a hedge against another Dust Bowl, as a recharge area for critical groundwater supplies and as an important form of carbon storage and gas recycling for a planet imperilled by global warming. The region’s unique combination of canyonlands, forested mesas and grasslands contains critical riparian systems that support a diverse range of flora and fauna found nowhere else. These ecosystems - now functioning in equilibrium - cannot be replaced if destroyed. The expansion would also force generational family ranchers from their lands, people who have a long history of working sustainably with the land and of making a vital contribution to the food security of the nation.

Also under threat are the largest dinosaur tracksite in the US, pictographs made by the region’s original inhabitants, Native American sacred sites and Hispanic placitas. Scars carved into the landscape from wagons traveling on the Santa Fe Trail are reminders of the fragility of the native grasslands. The threat of military takeover prompted the National Trust for Historical Preservation to place the area surrounding Piñon Canyon on its list of America’s most endangered historical places. Copies of all relevant legislation and other documents can be found online at Posted by administrator | Comments (0)

The Exiles - An Amazing L.A. Film Document Unearthed from 1961

July 11th, 2008

The Exiles - Film

“The Exiles” Play Movie Trailer from the NYT

Link text here

Making Great Chocolate Chip Cookies

July 10th, 2008

Please share your suggestions. However, this is a great starting point to obtaining the Best Chocolate Cookies in the Southwest. It is adapted from Jacques Torres and the NYT with some modifications:

Time: 43 minutes (for 1 6-cookie batch), plus at least 24 hours’ chilling

2 cups minus 2 tablespoons

(8 1/2 ounces) cake flour

1 2/3 cups (8 1/2 ounces) bread flour

1 1/4 teaspoons baking soda

1 1/2 teaspoons baking powder

1 1/2 teaspoons coarse salt

2 1/2 sticks (1 1/4 cups) unsalted butter

1 1/4 cups (10 ounces) light brown sugar

1 cup plus 2 tablespoons (8 ounces) granulated sugar

2 large eggs

2 teaspoons natural vanilla extract (Don’t use the cheap stuff. Vanilla can make or break your Cookies)

1 1/4 pounds bittersweet chocolate disks or fèves, at least 60 percent cacao content

Sea salt.

1. Sift flours, baking soda, baking powder and salt into a bowl. Set aside.

2. Using a mixer fitted with paddle attachment, cream butter and sugars together until very light, about 5 minutes. Add eggs, one at a time, mixing well after each addition. Stir in the vanilla. Reduce speed to low, add dry ingredients and mix until just combined, 5 to 10 seconds. Drop chocolate pieces in and incorporate them without breaking them. Press plastic wrap against dough and refrigerate for 24 to 36 hours. Dough may be used in batches, and can be refrigerated for up to 72 hours.

3. When ready to bake, preheat oven to 350 degrees. Line a baking sheet with parchment paper or a nonstick baking mat. Set aside.

4. Scoop 6 3 1/2-ounce mounds of dough (the size of generous golf balls) onto baking sheet, making sure to turn horizontally any chocolate pieces that are poking up; it will make for a more attractive cookie. Sprinkle lightly with sea salt and bake until golden brown but still soft, 18 to 20 minutes. Transfer sheet to a wire rack for 10 minutes, then slip cookies onto another rack to cool a bit more. Repeat with remaining dough, or reserve dough, refrigerated, for baking remaining batches the next day. Eat warm, with a big napkin.

Yield: 1 1/2 dozen 5-inch cookies.

Chocolate Chip Cookies

Pup named “Pup”
Missing near Madrid, New Mexico

July 8th, 2008


pup named pup

A letter to friends of animals in the Southwest:

Our beloved dog went missing on July 2nd in Madrid. He may possibly be trying to go in the direction of Cerrillos & Sante Fe. He is a black Australian Cattle Dog/Blue Heeler/Mix with a white patch on his chest. He ran off while we were visiting in Madrid and is not familiar with the local area; he is probably scared, tired & hungry. His name is Pup.

If you think you’ve seen him PLEASE contact us either via email reply or phone. If you know of anyone who may have seen him, please forward this email.

Please view his pictures at:
Pic 1
Pic 2

Thank You,
Cindylee or Bill Gruenwald
creatingcommunity@charter.net

G8 World Leaders
Battle Hunger over Fantastic Meal!

July 8th, 2008


G8 Leaders Dinner

According to The Huffington Post this was the menu for leaders discussing hunger while attending G8 summit on the Japanese island of Hokkaido. The menu included a six-course lunch and dinner provided delicacies such as caviar, milkfed lamb, sea urchin and tuna, with champagne and wines flown in from Europe and the U.S as leaders sought to battle world hunger.

Links:

Daily Mail

Save the Children website

Matt Harding

July 8th, 2008




New Mexico’s “Terminator Salvation”
State Shares Costs of Hollywood Films
Despite High Poverty and Lagging School Performance

July 3rd, 2008

Terminator

Michael Cieply of The New York Times reports on New Mexico’s Aggressive Film Incentives and the potential of a strike affecting the filming of the latest Terminator film being shot in New Mexico.

Mr. Cieply reports that New Mexico provides this film with, “25 percent rebate on virtually all film production expenditures in the state, without a cap. Thus the makers of “Terminator Salvation,” with a budget reported at more than $200 million, are expected to recoup tens of millions of dollars from a state government eager to showcase the production, New Mexico’s largest so far.”

The New York Times report adds, “Though relatively small, with a population of about two million, New Mexico has managed to keep its budget on an even keel, thanks in part to oil-, gas- and coal-related income, which has grown as energy prices have risen. Not incidentally, the state is expected to pick up part of the insurance costs of “Terminator Salvation.” Joe Finnegan, a vice president for entertainment insurance with Fireman’s Fund, and Steve Mangel, president of International Film Guarantors, a sister unit, declined to discuss their companies’ involvement with “Terminator Salvation.”

Link to the entire article:
The New York Times, July 2, 2008, This Film Will Be Back, Strike or No Strike. By Michael Cieply. ALBUQUERQUE


# # #

Perhaps giving money (via “film incentives”) to Hollywood Studios to film in New Mexico has positive cost benefits that should be considered. However, it is also the case that New Mexico has horrible levels of poverty and education. The State of New Mexico received a grade of D+ on Education Week’s Quality Counts Chance for Success Index.

New Mexico’s own Public Education Secretary has stated that in terms of New Mexico’s educational attainment, adult annual income, and steady employment, the state ranks 36th, 40th, and 43rd.

Is it possible that fixing schools in New Mexico rather than giving money to Hollywood Studios might be a more direct way to reverse matters? Dr. Veronica García, New Mexico Secretary of Education published a letter in the Albuquerque Journal, February 9, 2008 that points out how bad things are. In light of what she has written, perhaps New Mexico should reconsider its willingness to give money to Hollywood and focus on problems closer to home.

Below are excerpts of Dr. Veronica Garcia, New Mexico Public Education Secretary:

“In New Mexico, Family Income, Parent Education (at least one parent with a post secondary degree), Parental Employment and Linguistic Integration (children whose parents are fluent English Speakers). New Mexico ranked 50th, 47th, 46th, and 47th respectively.”

“New Mexico ranks second in the nation for the number of low-income children living 200 percent below the federal poverty threshold.”

“New Mexico ranks third in the nation for the greatest difference between the well-being of our low-income children and high-income children, according to Kids Count 2007.”

“To ensure that children of poverty have an equal opportunity to reach educational excellence and achieve success, we must ensure that all children be held to the same high level of expectation regardless of zip code, and we must help mitigate the impacts of poverty.”

Link to Dr. García’s Letter:Poverty Isn’t An Excuse; It’s a Call to School Reform

Link to New MexicoPublic Education Department

Japan’s Koji Wakamatsu
Puts 60s Radicals on the Screen
in “United Red Army”

June 22nd, 2008


Koji Wakamatsu - United Red Army

A 1960s genre of soft-core erotica in Japan was known as pinku eiga or pink film. Like its’ counterpart in the U.S. it was made by soldiers of production who pumped it out for years. The NYT reports that it once accounted for half of all movie production in Japan. While most pink-film directors were anonymous journeymen, the industry also nurtured its share of eccentric talents. Among the most talented is Koji Wakamatsu. According to the Times, he is “A gonzo auteur with a knack for eyebrow-raising titles (“Go, Go Second Time Virgin,” “Violated Women in White”) whose most interesting films owe as much to Karl Marx as to the Marquis de Sade.”

Here are excerpts of what Dennis Lim writes about Mr. Wakamatsu:

“Like many exploitation filmmakers Mr. Wakamatsu kept up a furious rate of production for much of his career. (He has about 100 movies to his credit and was also an executive producer of “In the Realm of the Senses,” the 1976 succès de scandale directed by his friend Nagisa Oshima.) At 72, having outgrown the smut-minded confines of the pink film, he has made his most ambitious work, “United Red Army,” a 190-minute chronicle of the tumultuous rise and self-destructive collapse of the Japanese militant student groups of the 1960s and ’70s. An intensively researched docudrama, teeming with dates, names and events, it is also a personal reckoning with a familiar narrative of idealism and disappointment: Mr. Wakamatsu and his regular screenwriter in the 1960s, Masao Adachi, were active members of the radical left.”

Link to article:

FILM Soft-Core Auteur Turns Attention to Radicals By DENNIS LIM Published: June 22, 2008

Next Page »

Credits: Wordpress, Sky3c, Kaushal Sheth, The Skyhorse Co.